Gay Pride, Scene Prejudice

Opinion piece originally published in GCN, May 2012 – Issue 269

Brighton Pride 2011 - Purple heels by the seafront

Photo: Heather Buckley

I never expected to see so many heavily pregnant women traipsing the streets, some with their hands clenched in the air while others grappled with the weight of giant baby bumps. Likewise, I was quite surprised to find a slew of doting hetero couples, not only lining the pavements, but marching alongside their queer buddies, demanding equal rights for all. You can bet your granny’s dentures that the sight of stoned hipsters waving the rainbow flag in this particular context was a whole new experience too. So perhaps it was inevitable that I would fall in love with Brighton that day, when I showed up for an ultra-liberal take on Gay Pride.

I’m fortunate enough to have travelled widely so far and, because of that, have witnessed many Pride events around the world. Nevertheless, none compared to that which happened in Brighton last year, the like of which seems to be the norm on that particularly sunny patch of southern England. It was the best Pride ever! It was the best because it actually achieved something.

Most of us will happily take to the streets every year and proclaim our rights for this, that or the other. Soon afterwards, we might take our discontent to the nearest gay bar or club and turn it into a party. Naturally, there’s no harm in that either.

Then again, it’s hard to measure the actual success of any Pride march, whether it’s that which spills onto the streets of Old Compton in London or that which marches towards Christopher Street in Lower Manhattan. The best that any of us can do is to show up, make our voices heard and hope for the best. In Brighton, however, the upshot is rather different. The Pride Festival itself is the real success. It is a giant, all-inclusive and rather wonderful salute to diversity; gay and straight, black and white, Christians and atheists, meat eaters and veggies, little monsters and Madonna die-hards. Indeed, what struck me most about Brighton Pride was that it engaged such an incredibly eclectic line-up of folks, all of whom held a similar agenda. As far as I could see, it didn’t really matter what happened after the party. The work was already done; best Pride ever!

Brighton Pride 2011 - Bare-chested blue-coloured hunk

Photo: Heather Buckley

As the evening edged closer to midnight, however, I noticed that the ravishing view of multi-cultural and cross-societal tolerance began to vanish. I suspect that many day trippers were, by then, hurriedly making their way to Brighton rail station, in hope of making that last train back to London. I can only assume that the hipsters, by then, were slowly migrating to North Laine, where they might have hoped to hear less of Lady Gaga and more of Led Zeppelin. Taking advantage of Kemp Town’s convenient layout of door-to-door gay bars, my friends and I ventured further afield, hoping to recapture some of that love buzz that had made the day so special. Alas, it was nowhere to be found.

As the clock finally struck twelve, I was suddenly left with an all too familiar sight… and an all too familiar sense of disappointment. What remained were very few women and very many men, lurking in dark corners, clutching pints and not talking to each other; just like a typically icy scene in Gay Paris, just like the hostility so often displayed in Barcelona’s boy bars, just like the status quo in Dublin’s queer city. Brighton Pride had been a success, alright, but for all the wrong reasons. The visitors had made the day special, but it would seem that the gay scene in Brighton was no more progressive than anywhere else on the globe.

Is this what we fought for? Is this why we endured and risked the pitfalls of the potentially difficult ‘coming out’ process? Is this why we scream so loudly for gay marriage? Has this entire struggle taken place just so that we can all feel a little more comfortable, while playing the part of the aloof and ever-elusive gay male? Of course, this outcome would be perfectly fine if what we all desired was the single, no-strings-attached lifestyle. Some of us do, that much is true. On the other hand, it only takes a few minutes of snooping through Gaydar profiles or swiping through Grindr pics to prove that, for most guys, this is not the case. It’s hard to deny that the general theme amongst gay men in particular is loneliness.

For a long time, parts of our community, both locally and internationally, have been blaming general discontent on everyone else. It’s the hetero’s fault for not accepting us. It’s the government’s fault for not granting us equality. Despite this, straight folks showed up in droves last summer for Brighton Pride and celebrated the fact that full equality is rapidly becoming a reality in the UK. I watched it all unfold before me. Yet, that didn’t seem to make much difference to the many gay men that moseyed through Kemp Town until the early hours, seemingly waiting for someone to say “hello”, at the very least.

No, I fear that we need to take some of the blame. We are a very lonely section of society and that particular outcome may be no-one’s fault but our own. We must melt that ice; defrost that cool exterior that is preventing many of us from finding great friendships and great love. What if we were all a wee bit nicer to each other, eh? What if that was our new theme for Pride? This doesn’t mean having to throw your leg over anyone who shows an interest. What it does mean, however, is showing respect to those who are kind enough to show an interest in the first place. Let’s not fester in dark corners, fabulously fashionable and impeccably groomed, all whilst living life in ‘mute’ or ‘standby’. If I may, I’d like to leave with you the wise words of one very famous homo, one who has let down his guard on more than one occasion, choosing to reveal more in public than many would even dare to imagine.

“Sometimes the clothes do not make the man.”

Brighton Pride 2011 - Old man in pretty blue frock

Photo: Heather Buckley

***

George Michael
Freedom ’90
1990

Check out GCN, Ireland’s leading LGBT magazine at www.gcn.ie

View Heather Buckley‘s photography at www.heatherbuckley.co.uk


Reinventing the Rant

Start

Day 2 of My Year of Reinvention.

Perhaps it would have felt a little more ceremonious to reveal my latest self to the world on the first of those 365 days. But alas, Day 1 just happened to coincide with April 1st. Therefore, an Irishman announcing his year of sobriety on April 1st would, of course, have seemed like little more than a rather daft April Fool’s prank.

Today is April 2nd, 2012; two down and 363 to go. And I ain’t kiddin’.

In recent weeks, I have found myself in a curiously defeatist state, one which might have easily culminated in the cessation of this fabulous blog and the commencement of a foul data entry job in a dark office space, somewhere in Dublin’s bustling city centre. This most horrid of outcomes would have involved wearing a tie, no less; not just one tie, but a different tie for every day of the week. These essential office fashion accessories would presumably have to match my freshly ironed shirts… or my perfectly pressed trousers… or both. Naturally, I would also be required to wear shoes; new shoes, that is, as I have not found cause to own a pair of faux leather slip-ons in quite some time.

Needless to say, there is no kind of World Saving Rant that could ever be enhanced by the complexities of daily tie selection, nor could it be enlightened by adventures sought during an hour-long lunch break. (Besides, Ricky Gervais has already cornered the market in office-inspired humour.) My beloved blog (along with my other writing projects) would most likely have to end and my new life as a would-be spreadsheet wizard would have to begin.

Something must change…

Future

Writing has left me poor; quite poor. I am 34 years old and swaying so dangerously close to poverty that I have seriously considered the idea of… giving up the dream. I have no savings and I am in debt (albeit minor debt in comparison to many other Irish people). I am currently living in my grandmother’s house, while she enjoys an extended visit with my sister in New Zealand. In six weeks time, she will return and I will move somewhere else. I’m not yet certain where that somewhere will be.

This might seem like very bad news… because it is, quite frankly. However, it is my choices that have led me here. It should be remembered that my dreary situation has been driven by a freakishly adventurous streak; that incessant need, not just to write, but to travel the world while doing so. Last year, I merged these two passions, adding a healthy serving of heart and soul for good measure. The result was my first book, a life changing project that simultaneously enriched my spirit and crippled my finances. To date, I have earned much praise for that book, it must be said, but the monetary rewards have paled in comparison.

So here we are… Broke, smashed, kaputt!

35 is the time. That is the age at which the cookie must crumble one way or another. That leaves me with one year to concoct a fabulous new recipe for healthy, wholesome living; one that will enable me to write more and travel further, one that will turn creative flare into a commercial venture. This is why My Year of Reinvention must be a sober one. Reinvention means little without 100% focus.

Success

I realise that this may sound a wee bit unrealistic to some readers; not least as this most ambitious of projects is now taking place within the confines of Dublin city, arguably the most fun place in the world to indulge in post-work booze and public house banter. Nevertheless, twelve months can be measured in many different ways. One year of abstinence is not going to make a huge difference to the rest of my life. One year of reinvention, on the other hand… (Watch this space!)

Yes, I could swig a bottle of beer or two on a Saturday night and barely notice the difference, if I wished. I might sneak a puff of a funny cigarette now and then, safe in the knowledge that I’m sensibly avoiding a hangover. Then again, “could” and “might” simply isn’t good enough. 100% is definite.

Whatever that final outcome might entail, whatever fate reveals itself on April 1st, 2013; it must be definite. If on that final day, it becomes undeniably clear that I must pick out that tie, that I must iron that shirt, that I must press those trousers (or that I must feck off to southern Spain and serve questionable beer from a small beach hut somewhere along the Costa del Sol; not too shabby), then at least I will know for sure that the result of My Year of Reinvention, come what may, will be definite…

Or well deserved.

“We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars”
Oscar Wilde

***

Madonna
Give It 2 Me
2008


Nothing But Love

Whitney Houston 1963-2012

Whitney Houston 1963-2012

This is my fourth attempt at writing this rant. Over the last few days, I’ve repeatedly sat down in front of my laptop in an effort to start my usual practice of pontificating in the most entertaining way possible. Until now, I guess the sting remained a little too sharp for me to proceed.

If it had been the passing of a friend or a family member, I might have allowed myself to unashamedly spill my guts, just as I have in relation to other topics in the past. This time around, however, the subject is merely the loss of a famous singer. To gush openly about the death of a superstar – one that I’ve never even met – might seem a little surreal to some folks. Admittedly, I myself have wondered if the subject is truly worthy of a World Saving Rant.

In case you hadn’t noticed, I’m referring to the death of Whitney Houston, undoubtedly my greatest childhood heroine.

Indeed, the premise of this particular entry has changed over the last few days. I could have easily spun yet another yarn about the genius behind that amazing, untouchable voice, the importance of her massive success in the context of race and gender, the debate over her true sexuality and why different cultures perceive homosexuality or bisexuality in different ways. Of course, there’s also a whole other discussion imminent, one which addresses the overbearing presence of drugs in the music business. Then again, much of this has been covered before and quite often since Whitney Houston’s passing last weekend.

No, what has struck me most of all in the last few days is this; a notable difference between how the public are expected to react to the death of a musical icon and the way in which we actually react to that event.

Whitney Houston American Music Awards 2009

American Music Awards - November 2009

It was inevitable, really. It happened following the untimely death of Michael Jackson in 2009 (read my reaction to his passing in my previous rant Who’s Bad?) and, yet again, after the sudden loss of Amy Winehouse in 2011, two incredible artists for whom I also have great respect and admiration. As suspected, the debate was returned to the table and the question once again raised; why do we place far greater importance on the passing of celebrities than we do on far more pressing matters that are occurring around the world?

In the case of Whitney, that question might have been adjusted to read the following; why is the death of a pop singer more newsworthy than the death of hundreds of Syrian civilians at the hands of their own government? It’s an absolutely fair question, too.

Here’s the thing… I don’t particularly care about celebrities, but I do care very much about great music and the people who make great music.

I know that the political upheaval in Syria is far more important than the death of Whitney Houston. I know that I am expected to be more horrified by what has happened, and is continuing to happen, in a country ravaged by corruption and violence than I am regarding a seemingly self-destructive singer. Every ounce of logic in my being would, no doubt, prove that to be the case. The truth, however, is that my actual feelings are very different.

Naturally, I can only speak for myself, particularly as my obsession with music is life-long and unwavering. I have followed Whitney’s career for 25 years, ever since I first caught glimpse of that now infamous music video for I Wanna Dance with Somebody on my great grandmother’s television set during the summer of 1987. Yes, I was certainly dazzled by that giant monstrosity of a perm that, thankfully, fell out of fashion swiftly afterwards. Nevertheless, it was accompanied by a pristine pitch-perfect vocal that seemingly belted from the TV set and shot to my heart immediately… and it never, ever left. I had not heard anything quite like it before and have not since.

It stuck around for years, always present for birthdays and Christmases, keeping me company in new schools and new jobs, lifting my spirits when meeting new friends and new lovers. Perhaps this particular superstar is most famed for providing a record-breaking soundtrack to the record-breaking film The Bodyguard, but she has also provided an even longer soundtrack for much of my life and that of millions of other people around the world.

Whitney Houston’s death is headline news. It is a big deal. The same must be said for the unexpected, tragic loss of other musical legends, such as John Lennon, Karen Carpenter, Marvin Gaye and Kurt Cobain, to name but a few. Many people in many places have shed many tears for these luminaries.

Some of the other news headlines I’ve read or listened to in recent weeks, months and years have certainly left me in shock. Nevertheless, they have rarely left a lump in my throat. In recent days, the opening chorus of I Will Always Love You, layered behind a sombre-toned journalist’s latest report on the death of Whitney ‘The Voice’ Houston, has done just that. It may be not logical, but it is human. And I won’t apologise for that.

Michael Jackson & Whitney Houston

R.I.P. Michael & Whitney

Love takes on many different shapes; it manifests into many different extremities. Some of us love our pet dogs, whilst others are almost allergic to the very idea of sharing a house with a hairy mammal. Some of us love our neighbours, whilst others don’t even know our neighbours’ names. We are all touched by different beings in different ways.

I love artists. I love musicians and producers and actors and directors. I really do. Sure enough, it may not compare to the deeper love that I have for family and friends. No, it is not the Greatest Love of All, not by a mile. That said, it is love, nonetheless.

And I most certainly won’t apologise for that.

***

Carpenters
Superstar
1971


Sex, Lies & Vevo

David CameronDavid Cameron and I will never be best buddies. He’s not on my Christmas card list. I shall not be following the PM on Twitter. In fact, his recent public comments about the need for British people to re-introduce Christian values into their lives left me feeling quite poorly, a little like the world’s first pregnant man battling a serious bout of morning sickness, whilst simultaneously trying to burrow through a potentially fatal man-flu.

I’m not sure I trust David Cameron. That uncertainty of character does not stem solely from his Conservative tag, but also from his apparent interest in sticking his prodding finger where it does not belong. Preaching Christian values to a nation that is made up of many faiths is one example of this. That said, I’d meet him for a pint. I would. He has some interesting ideas, at least, such as sticking two fingers up at Europe.

Another interesting idea coming from the Cameron camp, at the moment, is the introduction of age ratings for music videos. In this particular department, I can offer an affirmative thumbs up.

“I’d like to put you in a trance”

It is now twenty years since Madonna tried to conquer the world with a slew of steamy music videos and a book of nude photos. On the contrary, that book almost destroyed her career. In fact, it took a mighty combination of one film musical, one surprise baby, a dabble with Kabbalah, a little vocal training and a lot of genius from producer William Orbit before the world would truly love her again. Over half a decade passed before Madonna regained her crown as Queen of Pop; all because of a lil’ bit of naked hitchhiking from a street sidewalk in downtown Los Angeles.

Madonna hitchhiking naked (censored)

Ironically, Madonna’s Sex book and the accompanying music videos had actually been marketed very responsibly (despite the public outrage). The book in question was given a limited print run and sealed in a rather inconspicuous foil cover. When the soundtrack for Sex – namely the music video for Erotica – was banned from daytime viewing by MTV, the superstar (publicly, at least) supported this decision, acknowledging that it and the book contained “adult themes”.

Of course, the whole affair was little more than well-constructed fanfare on Madonna’s part, but there was always an element of social responsibility present.

“Chains and whips excite me”

These days, Rihanna sucking on a banana or being forcibly restrained by cellophane before singing about the joys of S&M is barely newsworthy. No-one blinks an eye. They shouldn’t have to either. It’s just sex, after all.

Britney Spears firing guns in East London, just after a raunchy romp with her Criminal boyfriend does little to cause a fuss. It shouldn’t either. It’s just fiction, after all.

The problem, however, is not these videos. The problem is the target audience.

Rihanna sexy pic (censored)

No doubt Lady Gaga would feed us some tried-and-tested line about “the right to freedom of expression” before she frolics around half-naked – gigantic hairdo aside – in her latest music video, just as Madonna did twenty years ago. Of course, she would be absolutely right.

Likewise, parents should also have the right to shield their children from these so-called “adult themes”. Parents should have the right to make an informed decision about what kind of imagery is blasted into their living rooms. Unfortunately, it’s virtually impossible to censor what our children see today. The internet is a free-for-all platform, where far more frightening imagery is freely available. Nevertheless, that does not mean that we should not at least try to protect our children. Surely, parents and popstars should share that social responsibility equally.

It worries me that sex and violence in music videos is not censored, that it does not receive the same scrutiny that would be cast upon a film or a video game. What must kids think when they watch these graphic clips? More significantly, what do they aspire to when they watch such sharp imagery?

“What’s going on?”

Recently, a young gay teenager from the States posted an incredibly touching clip on YouTube, which revealed just how much pressure kids are under today. Jonah Mowry’s story struck at the heart of hundreds of thousands of other isolated teens, many of whom responded with similar stories of bullying in their past or present lives. Peer pressure has always been an issue, of course, but as adults we can only imagine how horrific it must feel in the modern era of multimedia; bullying with the added sting of internet and text messaging.

Kids have enough to contend with. They really do. Children do not need the additional exercise of trying to dissect Rihanna’s strangely intimate relationship with a piece of fruit. Let’s give them some chance, for jaysus sake. (Let’s also avoid promoting bananas as an extra curricular activity.)

I’ve always believed that music video is a wonderful art form, one which has been most effectively harnessed by visionary artists such as Michael Jackson, Björk and, yes, even our ol’ veteran stripper pal Madonna. We should certainly encourage all musicians to create whatever visuals they feel is most appropriate to enhance their work. By the same token, we should also allow responsible adults to decide if those visuals are appropriate for general viewing. All art has a target audience. Sometimes that target audience is everyone, sometimes it’s only some.

The question is; can we trust David Cameron and his Conservative crew to sensibly decipher the difference between explicit sexuality and a cheeky bit of cleavage? Rest assured, if the British Prime Minister needs advice on the matter, I’d be willing to discuss it further over a few pints of ale in a toasty warm pub in Central London.

But only if he picks up the tab.

***

MGMT
Kids (Jon Salmon Version)
2008


The Greatest Weekend

Weekend
There was one very simple reason why I decided to write and self-publish my “gay hippy book” this summer. For many years, I had felt like no-one was speaking truthfully about life as an openly gay person, not in movies, not in music, not in books, not in magazines. No-one was saying anything of any interest to me. No-one was speaking for me. So… I decided to speak for myself.

Last night, however, I stumbled upon something quite astounding, a glimmer of optimism amongst the increasingly cynical representation of gay life within media and the arts.

Under normal circumstances, I would rather watch my granny score a tab of aspirin than sit through a gay-themed movie. Sure, I’ve tried many – movies, that is – but more often than not have felt no more inspired than I had two hours previous. (Notable exceptions are Beautiful Thing and Brokeback Mountain.) Poor acting, stereotypical characters and predictable storylines have usually left me more interested in playing with melting ice-cubes at the end of my over-priced fizzy drink, as opposed to investing any further time in a dodgy movie.

Naturally, I’d heard some hollers about the latest sample of gay cinema doing the rounds. The five-star accolades screaming from the promo poster for Weekend had certainly tempted me in recent weeks, but not enough to risk losing another two hours of my life. Nevertheless, the added special feature of Q&A with director Andrew Haigh at a screening at my local indie cinema last night (Duke of York’s Picturehouse, Brighton) finally persuaded me to take a leap of faith. And I’m so glad that I did…

Weekend tells the story of Russell (Tom Cullen), a shy, silent type that will hang out with straight buddies for a few beers before sneaking off to gay clubs for guaranteed inebriation and a potential one night stand. During one of these late night excursions, he meets Glen (Chris New), a brash, arty farty type that will share intimate details of his personal life with anyone who will listen. What follows is two days of sex and drugs (predictably) and intense conversations about what gay life actually entails (surprisingly).

Sex and drugs is nothing new in gay cinema, if truth be told. In this case, the depictions of each really work to the benefit of the movie. As graphic as such scenes are throughout, they effectively become a sidebar to the ongoing dialogue between the two main characters. Passionate discussions about the thorny matter of love and relationships – issues that are relevant to absolutely everyone – cannot help but become the main point of focus, so much so that I felt like offering a standing ovation midway through the screening.

Yes, yes, that’s exactly what I’ve been trying to say! Amen!

This is why I adore this movie. The modern-day excesses of debauchery are ever-present, but it’s the seemingly old-fashioned issue of love that steals the show. It speaks to me and many others about what gay men, in particular, really want from life. We are constantly being fed notions that what we all desire (or should desire) is sex, pecs and poppers, but that was never, ever true. Perhaps, this is why I have shied away from gay-themed movies and music and books and magazines. I could never see the truth through the haze of borderline propaganda.

My point, one which I’ve been trying to make for some time now, is that all of us – gay and straight alike – could make life so much easier for ourselves if we just dropped the bravado. In this movie, the two main characters are forced to do just that, mainly because their time spent together is limited by Glen’s pending emigration. The result is one of the most honest conversations you are ever likely to hear – fictitious or otherwise – about love and life. More importantly, that conversation is one which everyone can take part in, one which everyone can relate to.

As ever, it has taken the limited resources of a low-budget independent movie to step up to the task. Weekend very effectively demonstrates an important point, one that all viewers should take on board. Beyond the many overly complicated distractions of modern life, we really are all very simple and like-minded beings. We are all the same.

***

Robbie Williams
I Will Talk and Hollywood Will Listen (Live)
2001